you can measure and test it yourself by downloading the two weeks free demo here: Dirac RCS | Dirac ResearchĪlso I'm glad to read Bibo01's posts in this Forum, he knows Denis's DRC well and his comments are interesting :-)ĭid the first steps in using Amarra with IRC! Measured the room and made up 3 different filters, where one of them was close to the suggested target curve. Most probably you did not have the time to test it yet, if you'll do it you will see the pulse response correction (phase).ĭirac also successfully corrects phase in a wide listening area, which makes an important difference from the other similar applications, but you do'nt have to trust what I'm saying. but I have to say that the reason why Dirac is a commercial success is the fact that Dirac Live works most effectively in the time domain, and consequently handles phase-correction and pre-echo correction as well as frequency response correction. Well, please note first that I'm partial to Dirac. There is a learning curve no matter which solution you choose. This is not really a problem if you know what you are doing.īut that is your problem at this point: You want to get started and don't know much about it. But it has no user interface whatsoever, so you will have to use the command line and edit your target in a text editor: xy-coordinates. Audiolense is probably a little easier to get started with, but if you got a detailed guide and someone to ask for help it doesn't matter much.ĭRC-sourceforge is all free and pre-dates both Acourate and Audiolense. Both have excellent support directly from the author. I believe Audiolense has a money back gurantee if not satisfied. Neither is any huge commercial success - I don't think the authors can do without a job on the side, but that is just a guess. But it also seems to be the least advanced not offering XO, time domain, phase correction and pre-echo correction.Īudiolense and Acourate have all those features (not sure about Acourate and pre-echo). It offers a free trial and seems to have the least difficult user interface of the four I mentioned earlier. This is a major improvement over non-corrected sound, so that will explain the many happy users.ĭirac is a commercial success correcting audio in several expensive car models. They all seem to do frequency correction with a custom target. You can find many positive reviews of either software, but very few people seems to have tried more than one. I have not seen any test comparing Dirac, Acourate, Audiolense, DRC-sourceforce, and others. Perhaps I have overlooked some important facts which can influence my choice? I can wait until there have been loads of reviews, but by that time the Amarra offer to upgrade to Symphony IRC will be finished. What is holding me back to go the Acourate+JRiver route, is the fact that Ammara without IRC seems to be better sounding than JRiver for Mac. What is drawing me in the direction of Acourate+JRiver are the following points: 1) From what I've read, Acourate seems to be more "transparent" and better sounding than Dirac (not integrated in Amarra), 2) It seems that JRiver works more reliable than Amarra (I've experienced quite a few "problems" with Amarra with the last versions), 3) Without having tried, I think JRiver works nicer as a Music Library compared to ITunes (don't really like ITunes.) and it seems that JRemote is a very nice remote app. I am actually using "normal" Amarra 2.5.1 and really like the sound of it, but I would like to experience with Room Correction in my set.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |